[D9244AAB], Letter from Iowa Phonograph Co, Whitfield Stinson to Thomas Alva Edison, February 23rd, 1892
https://edisondigital.rutgers.edu/document/D9244AAB
→ View document with UniversalViewer → View document on Archive.org → Re-use this digital object via a IIIF manifest
Title
[D9244AAB], Letter from Iowa Phonograph Co, Whitfield Stinson to Thomas Alva Edison, February 23rd, 1892
Recipient
Mentioned
Date
1892-02-23
Type
Subject
Folder/Volume ID
D9244-F
Microfilm ID
133:674
Document ID
D9244AAB
Publisher
Thomas A. Edison Papers, School of Arts and Sciences, Rutgers University
Has Version
Transcription
Ans Feby 27/92
[TAE Marginalia] say we have tried such an arrangement not works well but Will Co will not delay them
Febry 23rd 1892
Thos A. Edison
Orange N.J.
Dear Sir:-
With a perfected long distance telephone will it not be possible by dictating to the phonograph revolving say fifty times a minute-to transmit matter by wire four or five times as fast-speed to be reduced for transcribing-such a combine could wire one thousand words per minute.
The action of diaphragms over reproducing point is positive and impulses carried by wire from phonograph records are much stronger than are those from the wire direct.
If no great difficulty his in the way would not such an arrangement be simpler than the whetstone telegraphic system? Considering the preparatory work in offices at both ends of a line.
Very truly yours
Whitfield Stinson
[TAE Marginalia] say we have tried such an arrangement not works well but Will Co will not delay them
Febry 23rd 1892
Thos A. Edison
Orange N.J.
Dear Sir:-
With a perfected long distance telephone will it not be possible by dictating to the phonograph revolving say fifty times a minute-to transmit matter by wire four or five times as fast-speed to be reduced for transcribing-such a combine could wire one thousand words per minute.
The action of diaphragms over reproducing point is positive and impulses carried by wire from phonograph records are much stronger than are those from the wire direct.
If no great difficulty his in the way would not such an arrangement be simpler than the whetstone telegraphic system? Considering the preparatory work in offices at both ends of a line.
Very truly yours
Whitfield Stinson